首页> 外文OA文献 >CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells act respectively as inducer and effector T suppressor cells in superantigen-induced tolerance.
【2h】

CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells act respectively as inducer and effector T suppressor cells in superantigen-induced tolerance.

机译:CD4 + CD25 +和CD4 + CD25- T细胞在超抗原诱导的耐受性中分别充当诱导剂和效应T抑制细胞。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The repeated injection of low doses of bacterial superantigens (SAg) is known to induce specific T cell unresponsiveness. We show in this study that the spleen of BALB/c mice receiving chronically, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) contains SEB-specific CD4(+) TCRBV8(+) T cells exerting an immune regulatory function on SEB-specific primary T cell responses. Suppression affects IL-2 and IFN-gamma secretion as well as proliferation of T cells. However, the suppressor cells differ from the natural CD4(+) T regulatory cells, described recently in human and mouse, because they do not express cell surface CD25. They are CD152 (CTLA-4)-negative and their regulatory activity is not associated with expression of the NF Foxp3. By contrast, after repeated SEB injection, CD4(+)CD25(+) splenocytes were heterogenous and contained both effector as well as regulatory cells. In vivo, CD4(+)CD25(-) T regulatory cells prevented SEB-induced death independently of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. Nevertheless, SEB-induced tolerance could not be achieved in thymectomized CD25(+) cell-depleted mice because repeated injection of SEB did not avert lethal toxic shock in these animals. Collectively, these data demonstrate that, whereas CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells are required for the induction of SAg-induced tolerance, CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells exert their regulatory activity at the maintenance stage of SAg-specific unresponsiveness.
机译:重复注射低剂量的细菌超抗原(SAg)可诱导特异性T细胞无反应性。我们在这项研究中显示,接受慢性,葡萄球菌肠毒素B(SEB)的BALB / c小鼠的脾脏包含SEB特异性CD4(+)TCRBV8(+)T细胞,对SEB特异性原代T细胞反应发挥免疫调节功能。抑制作用会影响IL-2和IFN-γ的分泌以及T细胞的增殖。但是,抑制细胞不同于天然CD4(+)T调节细胞(最近在人和小鼠中描述),因为它们不表达细胞表面CD25。它们是CD152(CTLA-4)阴性的,其调节活性与NF Foxp3的表达无关。相比之下,反复SEB注射后,CD4(+)CD25(+)脾细胞异质,既包含效应细胞又包含调节细胞。在体内,CD4(+)CD25(-)T调节细胞独立于CD4(+)CD25(+)T细胞阻止SEB诱导的死亡。但是,在经胸腺切除的CD25(+)细胞缺失的小鼠中无法达到SEB诱导的耐受性,因为重复注射SEB并不能避免这些动物的致命毒性休克。总体而言,这些数据表明,CD4(+)CD25(-)T调节细胞是诱导SAg诱导的耐受所必需的,而CD4(+)CD25(-)T细胞在SAg维持阶段发挥其调节活性。特定的无反应性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号